1 · POSITION
Maxime Gaillard opened the bistro that became Maxim’s at 3 rue Royale in Paris in 1893. A former waiter, he crossed from serving in someone else’s establishment to creating an address whose name would outlive him. His contribution was the beginning of the house, before its famous interior and international expansion. [1]
2 · A SHARED BEGINNING
Luxus Magazine’s history identifies Georges Everaert alongside Gaillard and records the early name as Maxim’s et Georg’s. Remembering that partnership changes the familiar story of a restaurant born complete from one man’s ambition. The first enterprise was a café and ice-cream establishment; the enduring name preserved only one of its founders. [2]
3 · THE ROOM ACQUIRES A PUBLIC
The house’s own account gives Irma de Montigny a decisive role in bringing a fashionable clientele to the small bistro. It also acknowledges that social success did not necessarily mean bills were paid. This is an origin story about a gathering place as much as a kitchen: the people who returned helped make the address desirable. [1]
4 · BEYOND THE FOUNDER
Eugène Cornuché subsequently shaped the restaurant associated with the Belle Époque and its Art Nouveau setting. That distinction matters to Gaillard’s authorship. He supplied the first business and the name; the familiar visual identity was developed under his successor. Later ownership, including Pierre Cardin’s acquisition in 1981, belongs to the institution’s subsequent history. [1, 2]
5 · ⚑ CANDOUR
⚑ The surviving accounts consulted here are histories of Maxim’s rather than a substantial independent biography of Gaillard. The role of Irma de Montigny is presented as the house’s recollection, not as an independently reconstructed episode. The record does not attribute Cornuché’s décor, later cuisine or the international brand to the founder. It establishes a specific origin, with shared credit where the evidence names another participant.
Sources & Further Reading
Sources consulted in September 2026. This short entry has a limited bibliography; its evidential limits are stated in Candour.